Perhaps you heard the rumblings in the news yesterday regarding a new study from the Centers for Disease Control that found that at least one in four teenage girls nationwide has a sexually transmitted disease. Take a minute to let your mind wrap around that statistic. Now let it roll off your tongue: ONE IN FOUR TEEN GIRLS HAS AN STD. This is not to be mistaken with the previous statistic that found that one in four "sexually active teens" has an STD. No, this is one in four teen girls, period, has an STD. Consider that the study found that nearly half of the girls in their sample were sexually active and among those, 40% tested positive for an STD. The study further found the HPV virus that causes cervical cancer is by far the most common sexually transmitted infection in girls age 14 to 19 with Chlamydia as the runner-up.
The CDC's Dr. Kevin Fenton said given that STDs can cause infertility and cervical cancer in women, "screening, vaccination and other prevention strategies for sexually active women are among our highest public health priorities."
Hmmm....Can you hear me growling? As for "prevention strategies," I've got a novel idea. Why don't we start speaking out against the key offenders who glamorize hooking-up as a standard teen right-of-passage? Did I hear or read one single media report that even so much as mentioned our hyper-sexualized culture as a possible cause of this new statistic? Nope. Not one. All I heard was "Abstinence programs are not effective, blah, blah, blah..."; "We need to require the HPV vaccine, blah, blah, blah..."; "We need to offer free STD screenings without requiring parental notification, blah, blah, blah..." Let's all brace ourselves for the slew of public service announcements for vaccines and screenings that will no doubt be coming down the pipe. I'm sure they will air during
Gossip Girls,
Desperate Housewives, and be in print in
Seventeen and
CosmoGirl, all key offenders who peddle the "just do it" message ad nauseam. Am I the only one who finds this hypocritical and just plain irresponsible?
Just recently, I tuned into a Sex in the City rerun out of pure curiosity, having heard much ado about the show in the past. Within five minutes, I had a lump in my throat and felt sick to my stomach. The focus of the show was, of course, the rampant hook-up sex the main characters experience. One of the main characters, Miranda, finds out she has Chlamydia and is forced to tally up all the men she has slept with in order to notify them that they may be a carrier. As she’s scribbling down name after name on a piece of paper, she expresses amazement that she somehow managed to get through law school, graduate with honors, and become a successful attorney in spite of the frequency of her little sex-tracurricular activity. Later, in a scene where she is in bed with her boyfriend, she refers to herself as a “dirty, diseased whore” and expresses concern that the list she made of her past sexual partners wasn’t a short one. He questions her about the number and with some prodding, she admits that she has slept with 42 different men. He follows by admitting to sleeping with over 60 women.
Meanwhile, another character, Carrie Bradshaw, played by Sarah Jessica Parker, is confused as to why her new love interest of just ten days has not accepted her invitation to spend the night (translation: have hook-up sex). After she confronts him and boldly asks for a reason, he explains that it’s just been ten days and after sleeping casually with so many different women, he is trying to move in the direction of saving sex for someone he truly cares for. As her date kisses her at the door and walks away, she ponders this unpredicted shift from sex to romance and how it caught her off guard and didn’t even enter her mind as a possibility in a relationship. She concludes her thoughts with the classic statement, “Are we simply romantically challenged, or are we sluts?” Am I allowed to answer that?
I am a realist and I know that a biblical message of saving sex for marriage is not going to gain a cultural endorsement. However, that doesn't mean we give up the fight. We need to make sure that our children are clear on the "why" behind God's mandate to save sex for marriage. As a back-up, we also need to make sure that the words
"cancer" and
"infertility" are etched in our daughters' minds as possible outcomes to sex outside of marriage. For the girls who could care less about God's moral standards, let's see if a fear of cancer (and possibly, death) and infertility don't resonate on some level with them and in turn, alter their risky behaviors. And that my friend, is a message that could gain cultural endorsement. Just as the tobacco industry was eventually shamed into silence when studies concluded that smoking was not as glamorous as the advertisements touted, we need to insist that a similar approach is taken with key offenders who are notorious for glamorizing sex without telling the truth about the consequences.
I want to see the characters in these shows dealing with the shame and embarrassment that comes from contracting an STD and having to tell their partner or future spouse. Or how about the writers allow a character to get cervical cancer and go through a painful treatment process and fear death? How about we put a twist on Carrie Bradshaw's marriage in the upcoming Sex In the City movie releasing in a few months and we see her break the news to her beloved that she is infertile due to an STD? Better yet, what if we show our girls the reality that some men will not even consider marrying a woman with an STD? Mind you, some of the same men no doubt who were all too happy to sleep around but don't have the same price to pay in the end. Perhaps,
Seventeen and
CosmoGirl can profile adult women who have cervical cancer or struggle with pain of infertility. Let's hear the stories about expensive fertility treatments and endless shots that have to be taken daily and see the tears that flow regularly when the pregnancy tests continue to show up negative. I won't hold my breath...
It's up to parents to have a new and improved sex talk with our daughters (and sons). Amazingly, I devoted an entire "conversation" to this very subject in my upcoming book,
Five Conversations You Must Have With Your Daughter. The whole premise behind the book is that each of the conversations are "ongoing conversations" that need to take place from cradle to college. In the meantime, I sat my own daughter down yesterday and shared the latest statistics and then cornered the 14 year-old up in his room. College Boy comes home this evening and will get an earful at some point over his Spring Break vacation. Let's not forget the impact this statistic will have on our sons, as well. It certainly puts Proverbs 31:10 into perspective. "Who can find a virtuous woman? Her price is far above rubies."
Update: I have had several emails or comments come in asking for clarification on my position to the HPV vaccine. My answer can be found in the comments. I will plan to do some research on further progress regarding the vaccine and post about it in the near future. Tomorrow, I am planning to post some actual talking points that I am using with my daughter (nearly 18) and my two sons (15, 19) regarding the ramifications of the finding in the CDC study that 1 in 4 teen girls has an STD. I would love to hear yours as well!